Part One: Evaluating New Objections to the Mytho-Historical Adam | EPS
Description
At the 2025 joint conferences of the Evangelical Theological and Philosophical Societies, a panel of scholars respond to Dr. Craig's book, In Quest for the Historical Adam. In Part One, each the five panelists will present his lecture in full. Part Two includes their responses, comments by Joshua Swamidass, panel discussion, and audience Q&A.
00:00:00 - Welcome & Intro
00:00:48 - Angus Menuge (Concordia University Wisconsin): Theoretical Virtues, Models for Science and Religion engagement, and Human Origins
00:11:38 - Michael N. Keas (Biola University): New Objections to the Mytho-Historical Adam and Genealogical Adam and Eve Theories
00:33:24 - William Lane Craig (Talbot School of Theology): The Mytho-Historical Adam and Eve View (Compared to the Views of Keas and Loke)
00:59:02 - Andrew Ter Ern Loke (Hong Kong Baptist University) : The Genealogical Adam and Eve View (Compared to the Views of Keas and Craig)
01:22:56 - C. John “Jack” Collins (Covenant Theological Seminary) : How to Evaluate the Mytho-Historical and Genealogical Adam and Eve Views as Exegetical Hypotheses (presented in abstentia by Angus Menuge)
Watch Part Two here: • Video
For more resources visit: reasonablefaith.org
We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips: / drcraigvideos
Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: / rfupdates
Like the Reasonable Faith Facebook Fan Page: / reasonablefaithorg
Maintained by The Apologist Project.