Part One: Evaluating New Objections to the Mytho-Historical Adam | EPS

Description

At the 2025 joint conferences of the Evangelical Theological and Philosophical Societies, a panel of scholars respond to Dr. Craig's book, In Quest for the Historical Adam. In Part One, each the five panelists will present his lecture in full. Part Two includes their responses, comments by Joshua Swamidass, panel discussion, and audience Q&A.

00:00:00 - Welcome & Intro

00:00:48 - Angus Menuge (Concordia University Wisconsin): Theoretical Virtues, Models for Science and Religion engagement, and Human Origins

00:11:38 - Michael N. Keas (Biola University): New Objections to the Mytho-Historical Adam and Genealogical Adam and Eve Theories

00:33:24 - William Lane Craig (Talbot School of Theology): The Mytho-Historical Adam and Eve View (Compared to the Views of Keas and Loke)

00:59:02 - Andrew Ter Ern Loke (Hong Kong Baptist University) : The Genealogical Adam and Eve View (Compared to the Views of Keas and Craig)

01:22:56 - C. John “Jack” Collins (Covenant Theological Seminary) : How to Evaluate the Mytho-Historical and Genealogical Adam and Eve Views as Exegetical Hypotheses (presented in abstentia by Angus Menuge)

Watch Part Two here:   • Video  

For more resources visit: reasonablefaith.org

We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:

reasonablefaith.org/forums

Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips:    / drcraigvideos  

Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter:   / rfupdates  

Like the Reasonable Faith Facebook Fan Page:   / reasonablefaithorg  

Maintained by The Apologist Project.

Contributors

William Lane Craig

AUTHOR
Reasonable Faith

Reasonable Faith

CHANNELS
The Apologist Project

We Need Your Support

We are a nonprofit that can only continue this mission with your prayers and financial support. Would you prayerfully consider a one-time or recurring gift to help us reach seekers of truth and sharpen the knowledge of believers?