The Genesis Debate: Three Views on the Days of Creation

4.50 out of 5 stars

Description

The Genesis creation days: 24 hours, ages of time, or a literary framework? In The Genesis Debate, three teams of evangelical scholars, united in their commitment to the infallibility and inerrancy of Scripture, delve into this pivotal question. J. Ligon Duncan III and David W. Hall present a compelling case for the 24-hour view, positing that the six creation days unfolded in sequential, 24-hour increments. Hugh Ross and Gleason L. Archer, meanwhile, advocate for the day-age view, suggesting that each creation day represents a finite, yet unspecified, period of time. Rounding out the trio, Lee Irons and Meredith G. Kline propose the Framework view, which interprets the six-day creation narrative as a figurative, rather than literal, depiction of God's creative acts. Regardless of your familiarity with the creation-day debate, The Genesis Debate promises to enrich your understanding and fortify your faith.

Maintained by The Apologist Project.

Contributors

Meredith G. Kline

AUTHOR

David G. Hagopian

AUTHOR

J. Ligon Duncan III

AUTHOR

David W. Hall

AUTHOR

Lee Irons

AUTHOR

Gleason L. Archer

AUTHOR

Hugh Ross Ph.D.

AUTHOR

There are currently no matching Collections.

The Apologist Project

We Need Your Support

We are a nonprofit that can only continue this mission with your prayers and financial support. Would you prayerfully consider a one-time or recurring gift to help us reach seekers of truth and sharpen the knowledge of believers?