Five Views on Apologetics

4.40 out of 5 stars

Description

The series is a valuable resource for pastors, students, and thoughtful Christians who want to engage with the best of Christian scholarship and make informed decisions about the issues that matter most. Among the various approaches to apologetics, which one reigns supreme in persuasively defending Christianity against accusations of falsehood and inconsistency? As an intellectual discipline, apologetics aims to strengthen the faith of believers and support evangelism efforts. But do some methods hold more weight than others? In Five Views on Apologetics, five prominent techniques are put under scrutiny: the classical approach of William Lane Craig, the evidential method of Gary Habermas, the cumulative case approach of Paul D. Feinberg, the presuppositional stance of John M. Frame, and the reformed epistemology of Kelly James Clark. This book provides a platform for each contributor to present, critique, and defend their viewpoint, allowing readers to form their own informed conclusions. As part of the Counterpoints series, this volume offers a fair-minded and respectful comparison of scholarly views on crucial Christian topics, enabling readers to engage with the best of Christian scholarship and make informed decisions about the issues that matter most.

Contributors

Kelly James Clark

AUTHOR

Paul D. Feinberg

AUTHOR

John M. Frame

AUTHOR

Steven B. Cowan

AUTHOR

Stanley N. Gundry

AUTHOR

William Lane Craig

AUTHOR

There are currently no matching Collections.

The Apologist Project

We Need Your Support

We are a nonprofit that can only continue this mission with your prayers and financial support. Would you prayerfully consider a one-time or recurring gift to help us reach seekers of truth and sharpen the knowledge of believers?