Five Views on Apologetics
4.40 out of 5 stars
Description
The series is a valuable resource for pastors, students, and thoughtful Christians who want to engage with the best of Christian scholarship and make informed decisions about the issues that matter most.
Among the various approaches to apologetics, which one reigns supreme in persuasively defending Christianity against accusations of falsehood and inconsistency? As an intellectual discipline, apologetics aims to strengthen the faith of believers and support evangelism efforts. But do some methods hold more weight than others? In Five Views on Apologetics, five prominent techniques are put under scrutiny: the classical approach of William Lane Craig, the evidential method of Gary Habermas, the cumulative case approach of Paul D. Feinberg, the presuppositional stance of John M. Frame, and the reformed epistemology of Kelly James Clark. This book provides a platform for each contributor to present, critique, and defend their viewpoint, allowing readers to form their own informed conclusions. As part of the Counterpoints series, this volume offers a fair-minded and respectful comparison of scholarly views on crucial Christian topics, enabling readers to engage with the best of Christian scholarship and make informed decisions about the issues that matter most.
Maintained by The Apologist Project.
Claim this ProfileContributors
There are currently no matching Collections.